![]() |
Fear of Words:
Alvin M. Schrader. Subject Headings:
Professional / Post-Secondary. ****/4
|
excerpt:
. . . the fear of words will never cease and the desire to censor them will never die.. . .
Unless public librarians live the principles of intellectual freedom and access as agents of all of the body politic, through policies, procedures and integrity, they abdicate their claim to institutional prerogative and institutional autonomy. . .
The evidence from this study suggest that public librarians as a community should be more consistent champions of the rights of children and young adults to have unqualified access to library materials. . . . age-related restrictions and other institutional barriers to access violate the "social contract" for intellectual freedom that public library staff unofficially, if not officially, endorse. . . . How a balance can be achieved between social ideology that expects public librarians to protect children and the larger moral imperative to restrict the rights of minors, is and remains an unresolved -- and difficult issue.
THESE ARE SOME OF THE CONCLUSIONS that Alvin Shrader draws from his superbly crafted research study of censorship in Canadian public libraries:
This study, the first national project of its kind in the world, has attempted to identify the scope and nature of community pressures to censor materials housed in the nation's public libraries and to document the ways in which public librarians across the country responded to these pressures.
In Part One of
this study, Shrader explains that a review of the literature on
censorship in Canadian public libraries revealed very little research
into the kinds of community pressures that exist, how pervasive they are,
or how often public librarians remove, or restrict access to, materials
challenged.
In outlining the
conceptual framework of the project, he notes several important earlier
U.S. Studies, emphasizing the need for a precise distinction between
censorship ("a presumption in favour of thought control") and selection
("a presumption in favour of liberty of thought"). Shrader approaches
his work by examining three main aspects of the context in which
censorship exists:
Shrader gathered
information nationally, in English and French, from a three-year period
from 1985 through 1987. A questionnaire covered five main areas of
inquiry:
Part Two of
Fear of Words is a detailed presentation of the findings
uncovered by the exploration of the five main areas of interest outlined
above. The hundreds of responses quoted reveal the multitude ways
Canadian public librarians deal with issues related to access. These
quotes also make fascinating reading!
Shrader's
conclusions (suggested by the excerpts at the beginning of this review)
include several other factors affecting censorship -- most importantly,
those that operate at the level of the individual psyche. Shrader's plans
for further research on these factors illustrate just how complex the
issue is -- they involve insights from reader-response theory, social
learning theory, and anthropology. Investigating them will require more
complex research designs than the present one, but Shrader is confident
their study will yield much enlightening information on censorial
attitudes in general.
Included in the
book are several bibliographies, an index, the survey questionnaires
themselves, covering letters, various statements on intellectual freedom,
the 1995 Book and Periodical Council Freedom to Read Week Reading List,
and a list of materials challenged between 1985 and 1987. There are also
thirty-three tables and figures to illustrate the data analysis.
Fear of
Words is a landmark study that I hope will be read carefully by
all public librarians in Canada. It exemplifies an unusually high level
of research methodology in its attempt to uncover information and analyze
data accurately. It is honest about its limitations.
The only
reservation I have is that Shrader expresses his own personal view of the issue so passionately. One is always tempted to suspect that a researcher finds just what they want to find in any
available data unless a scientific impartiality and objectivity has been
rigorously applied.
The problems
inherent in materials selection or rejection reach deep into the human
psyche, and into a kaleidoscope of cultural, religious, political, and
economic conditions. Public librarians will forever be caught between one
man's meat and another's poison. Besides, values and tastes are always in
flux. Ideologies hailed as true in one era or one region are taboo in
others. Yet the concept of freedom -- not to be confused with license --
is dear to the human soul.
I believe Shrader
is correct when he writes:
In the last resort, it is not the force of law but only the force of free intelligence that can save a people from its own folly. In this light, I believe it is better to err on the side of more access rather than on the side of less.Shrader seems to believe that humanity can trust its innate potential for good, and that we are, finally, more inclined to embrace truth and justice than their opposites. I hope he's right.
This landmark
study on the crucial issue of censorship deserves a careful reading by
Canadian librarians in all field of practice.
Highly recommended.
Maryleah Otto is a former children's librarian in Toronto and London, Ontario, and the author of four published books for children. Her graduate work, apart from library science, dealt with the literature of modern romance languages.
More information on Fear of Words and how to order this title from the Canadian Library Association.
To comment on this title or this review, send mail to cmeditor@mts.net.
Copyright © 1996 the Manitoba Library Association. Reproduction for personal use is permitted only if this copyright notice is maintained. Any other reproduction is prohibited without permission.
Published by
The Manitoba Library Association
ISSN 1201-9364